Archive for May, 2007

The World Series of Poker Starts Friday!

WSOP Chip

It’s that glorious time of year again! The World Series of Poker (”WSOP”) starts tomorrow, at the Rio All-Suite Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas.

Contrary to common belief among those unfamiliar with the WSOP, it’s not a single poker tournament. Rather, it’s a series of tournaments — 55 this year — culminated by a colloquially “Main” and formally “World Championship” event. The buy-ins (entry fees) range from $500 to $50,000. A complete schedule is on the official WSOP Web site.

I’ve only played in a WSOP event once, in 2005, just 6 months after I started playing poker. I didn’t know what I didn’t know back then. I skipped last year, but this year my poker buddies and I will be returning. I plan to enter at least three of the smaller, $1,500 buy-in no-limit hold ‘em events and then play cash games on the side.

As the tournament proceeds, you can see live coverage on the WSOP site, PokerPages and CardPlayer.com.

Wish us luck!

Are Crocs hideously ugly?

Lady Crocs

Are Crocs hideously ugly? I think so. Yet I am seeing them more and more frequently around town and even at the office. And, I daresay, I am tempted to get a pair. Just yesterday, at R.E.I., I resisted the temptation.

I grew up in L.A. and went to school in the Bay Area. When I moved to Chicago, I was shocked at how frumpy and out of shape the people were. When I returned to the Bay Area, I thought people dressed so much better than Chicagoans and were in much better shape. Now, when I visit L.A. or New York, I am reminded what a bunch of crunchy granola slobs we Bay Area residents are.

I’m fearful a purchase of Crocs would irrevocably slide me further down the path towards whatever is the antithesis of sartorial splendor. I already own 3 pairs of Birkenstock’s, so it may be too late already.

What do you think of Crocs? Take the “What do you think of Crocs?” Survey. I’ll report the results.

My Poker Library and Top 5 Poker Books

poker.jpg

By request, I’ve just published a complete bibliography of my poker books, all acquired since I started playing in 2004 (and I blame you, H.N., for introducing me to the game!). As you can see easily, my “passions” run deep.

I characterize poker books in 6 broad categories:

  • Stories about poker, e.g., The Biggest Game in Town
  • General advice, e.g., Ace on the River
  • General theory, e.g., The Theory of Poker
  • Strategy, which I sub-categorize as either General, e.g., Super System, Cash Game, e.g., Middle Limit Holdem, or Tournament, e.g., Harrington on Hold ‘em. I’ve chosen this format-based classification scheme. Poker games can be classified by physical location (online or brick & mortar), format (cash or tournament), game (hold ‘em, stud, Omaha, etc.) or stakes (low, medium, high, etc.). Most books concentrate on a combination but not all of these classification attributes.
  • Psychology, which I sub-categorize as either General, e.g., The Tao of Poker, or Tells, e.g. Caro’s Book of Tells.
  • Other . . . Last, there are miscellaneous reference and other books, such as The Rules of Poker or Poker Protection.

I have a whopping 36 books. I’ve read 20 cover-to-cover and portions of 14; I haven’t yet started 2. My collection includes 2 books on poker stories, 2 general advice books, 2 general theory books, 21 strategy books, 7 psychology books and 2 other books.

Have these books made me a better player? Absolutely yes.

My top 5 favorite books, in order, are:

  1. Middle Limit Holdem Poker by Bob Ciaffone and Jim Brier . . . fantastic strategy book, perfect for the $20/40 game in which I typically play, in a discussion and problem-solution format
  2. The Professor, the Banker and the Suicide King by Michael Craig . . . fun, modern-day storytelling of billionaire Andy Beal’s challenge to the poker elite in Vegas
  3. Harrington on Hold ‘em: Expert Strategy for No-limit Tournaments Volume II: The Endgame by Dan Harrington . . . even better than Volume I
  4. Harrington on Hold ‘em: Expert Strategy for No-limit Tournaments Volume I: Strategic Play by Dan Harrington . . . seminal book on tournament play
  5. Ace on the River by Barry Greenstein . . . all-around great book on the proper mindset
  6. Beyond Tells: Power Poker Psychology by James A. McKenna . . . not for everybody, but helped me a ton with my discipline and tilt avoidance.

As I finish up my partially-read books, I’ll publish book reviews here.

Still No Response From JH On Dinner Time Survey

Yes, yes, I know he’s busy, but, after all the hullabaloo, JH still has not responded to the “Reasonable” Dinner Time survey results. At my desk last Monday, he briefly read the post on results and immediately replied, “These people are lying.” That remark alone reveals all you need know about his objectivity.

He promised to trash my post, and I eagerly continue to await that — in the same way Vladimir and Estragon waited for Godot. I shan’t hold my breath.

JH, you write a retort in comments or send it to me, and I promise to approve it/post it here.

My First Ever Country Music Concert

Me at the Brad Paisley Concert, 19 May 2007

To my pleasant surprise, I had a great time at my first ever country music concert, Friday at the Shoreline Amphitheater.

Frankly, I didn’t even know the singers before I went, but I won’t soon forget the names of Brad Paisley, Kellie Pickler, Jack Ingram & Taylor Swift.

My top impressions and thoughts:

  • Country music fans are awesome. By awesome, I mean totally engaged in the concert, belting out with feeling the lyrics of every song, just chilling out for an evening of great tunes.
  • Country music fans are awesome. By awesome, I mean that the women . . . are, uh . . . attractive.
  • Taylor Swift, who opened the show, is going to be huge. She’s young (born in 1989, yikes!), gorgeous and composes and sings great. I hope she can keep her head screwed on straight and keep creating. In addition to her official Web site, check out Taylor’s MySpace page. She’s back in town on June 1 at the Rodeo Club, and I’m going to try to catch her performance.

Taylor Swift CD Cover

  • Asians abound in the Silicon Valley — but not at Shoreline Friday night! I didn’t see a single other Asian dude and saw only a mere handful of Asian women.
  • Kellie Pickler . . . needs to think about the brand of her. I don’t watch “American Idol,” but I understand that Kellie had some . . . er, enhancements made to her chest area post-Idol. Apparently, she’s not shy about sharing them. During a segment of Brad Paisley’s performance, a camera backstage showed Kellie playing strip poker with a band member. She lost a hand, literally lost her shirt (stripped it off) and displayed her enhancements on camera, albeit covered by her bra. The audience went nuts.
  • Brad Paisley put on a great show. Not having known any of the singers, I didn’t see how the performances of Taylor, Jack Ingram & Kellie could be topped, but Brad Paisley unequivocally was the headliner. I’ve already downloaded his most recent album from iTunes.

Thanks for the invite, JI!

Boo! “The Office” Is Over For The Season! :(

Creed Thoughts

Beware of the spoilers below!

Last night’s season finale episode, “The Job,” may have been the very best from all three seasons. Among the many great lines & moments, here were my favorites:

  • “Hey, what’s different about you? You look worse.” — Kevin, on Jim’s haircut
  • “You got a haircut. It’s sexy hot. . . . Turn around. . . . Do it!” — Meredith, also on Jim’s haircut
  • “Pam is . . . kind of a bitch.” — Karen, after Karen’s apology to her
  • “You know what? Don’t even worry about it. Everyone was so drunk I bet no one even remembers what you said.” — Meredith, on Pam’s outburst at the lake
  • “I remember. I blogged the whole thing. W-W-W dot CreedThoughts dot gov dot W-W-W backslash CreedThoughts. Check it out.” — Creed
  • “Last year, Creed asked me how to set up a blog. Wanting to protect the world from being exposed to Creed’s brain, I opened up a Word document on his computer and put an address at the top. I’ve read some of it. Even for the Internet, it’s . . . pretty shocking.” — Ryan, on Creed’s blog
  • “I sold it on eBay. The buyer was very motivated, as was I. It went for 80% of what I paid. Sold it in record time.” — Michael, on selling his condo at a discount
  • “No, Dwight, I don’t care if that’s how they consolidated power in ancient Rome.” — Angela, responding to Dwight’s question “How would you like to spend the night with the Regional Manager of Dunder Mifflin, Scranton?”
  • “Okay, just so I understand it, in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell, and you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.” — Jim, on Dwight’s wildest fantasy
  • “So I will need a new number two. My ideal choice? Jack Bauer, but he is unavailable, fictional and overqualified.” — Dwight
  • “She made me do a lot of things I didn’t want to do” - Michael, on how Jan might force him to get back together with her
  • “I would never do that — waste of money. In my experience, guys are way more attracted to the back of you than in the front.” — Kate, on Jan’s boob job
  • “I find it offensive. Au naturel, baby, that’s how I like ‘em. Swing low, sweet chariots.” — Creed, on Jan’s boob job
  • “I’ll tell you this: It is not because of the boob job — excuse me, boob enhancement. That would be shallow, and this is the opposite of shallow. This is emotionally magnificent.” — Michael, justifying why he was getting back together with Jan
  • “I guess we’re getting back together. Your advice was good, but Jan’s was bigger.” — Michael, justifying why he was getting back together with Jan
  • “That is ‘Beardie.’ . . . That’s not his real name. That’s just what I call him.” — Michael, naming a Dunder Mifflin employee whose name he doesn’t know
  • “Three months ago I was nowhere. I was just a Cornell grad in anger management. But look where I am now. Not bad.” Andy, while washing Dwight’s spit cup
  • “Just say I want to squeeze them. It’s code. She’ll know what it means.” — Michael, asking Jan’s administrative assistant to take a message for her
  • “Well, I guess you could come and stay at my condo. I think I could back out of the sale, probably get some negative feedback on my eBay profile.” — Michael
  • “Live together . . . actually, wait a minute. This could be great. This could be perfect. You know, my full-time job could be our relationship. I could wear stretch pants and wait for you to come home at 5:15. It could work. This could work, really.” — Jan
  • “Ryan, coffee. . . . No, it’s for me, bimbo.” — Michael, asking Ryan for coffee and responding to his response, “I don’t do that stuff anymore.”
  • “Jim and I are just too similar. Maybe one day I’ll find my own Karen. But — that is — a — you know — not — a man, a man version.” — Pam
  • Pam’s sweet smile when Jim asked her out to dinner
  • “It’ll be nice to have another MBA around here.” — David, offering Ryan a job

It’ll be a long wait until the new season in the fall. I’m already shuddering at the thought of how the writers might resolve the love triangle among Jim, Pam & Karen. By the way, why doesn’t the biographical profile of the actress playing Karen appear on The Office Web site? Should we infer anything from the omission???

Dilbert on Dashboards

I love Dilbert. I don’t know how Scott Adams stays so in tune with corporate life in America.

Having done six sigma work and having managed a team of analysts who generated dashboards, scorecards and other reports, I found today’s comic strip particularly humorous.

Dilbert on Dashboards

Penelope Trunk’s Career Advice

I recommend Guy Kawasaki’s post on career guidance from Penelope Trunk, author of Brazen Careerist: The New Rules for Success. The post, a 10-question interview of Trunk, is a short, insightful read. I’ve ordered the book from Half.com and will let you know what I think once I read it.

You’ll have to read the interview answers in the post to understand fully these comments I have on them:

Answer #1 ($40K is enough for happiness) . . . Even in Silicon Valley???

Answer #4 (promotions are passe) . . . My sense without having read it yet is that Trunk’s book is targeted at individuals earlier in their careers. The notion that training, mentoring, life style, etc. may be more important than money certainly is compelling or at least important. But it’s also somewhat evocative of what HR departments try to sell employees instead of actual compensation these days.

Answer #5 (specialization is a better path than generalization) . . . Great answer to a question I’ve asked myself repeatedly over the past several years and one with which I’ve been wrestling recently.

Answer #7 (an MBA is not the answer to not being able to find a job) . . . I’ll reserve judgment until I read the book, but there are other reasons to get an MBA besides not being able to find a job. The wording of the question and subsequent answer here matter.

Answer #8 (stick to one-page resumes) . . . After a brief detour to two-pagers, I’ve reverted to this tried-and-true advice.

“Reasonable” Dinner Starting Times: Survey Results

Thanks to those who completed the Dinner Time survey!

Now, the background: I have a standing weekly Wednesday dinner with three buddies — one person picks a place and pays each week. The default meeting time is 7:30 p.m, but our empirical meeting times have ranged from ~7:00 p.m. - ~8:30 p.m., and, regardless, the weekly picker/payer chooses.

I would prefer to plan to meet for dinner around 7:00 p.m., because:

  • I leave the office before then
  • We almost always start late (and I am a culprit!)
  • I believe it’s better to eat earlier in the evening to have more time to metabolize the food
  • I prefer that my final meal of the day end several hours before bedtime (our meals run perhaps two hours on average)
  • That’s when I’m hungry and want to eat.

One of my buddies — let’s call him Jessie Heed-’em-no (or “JH”*) — in contrast, tends to leaves the office later than I do, might exercise and then eat some days, stays up later and wakes in the morning later.

No problem. He can pick his starting time and I can pick mine, right? Wrong! Last Wednesday, I had the gall to suggest a 6:30 p.m. dinner time — because the restaurant, a BBQ dive, closed at 8:00 p.m. — and met with staunch resistance from JH, the same resistance he’s presented to milder extent even with 7:00 p.m. meeting times. (Similarly, I’ll readily admit I’ve whined about dinner times later than 7:30 p.m.).

Now, in general, I respond better to sincere requests than to what I’m typically presented by JH when I suggest earlier dinner times: disparaging ad hominem attacks about my age, belittlement of my current workload and assertions that I am “unreasonable.” With regard to the last, JH bombastically asserted that, if we polled others, I would be revealed as patently “unreasonable” in wanting to eat on the early side. Thus the survey.

Thirty-five people — obviously not statistically significant — responded. Without further adieu, here are the results (click on each graph for a larger image). Read the data, and you be the judge.

Question #1: Around what time do you usually start eating dinner?

Dinner Time Survey Question 1

Question #2: Ideally, around what time would you prefer to start eating dinner?

Dinner Time Survey Question 2

Question #3: What is the earliest time you believe it is “reasonable” to start eating dinner?

Dinner Time Survey Question 3

Question #4: What is the latest time you believe it is “reasonable” to start eating dinner?

Dinner Time Survey Question 4

Question #5: What do you consider to be your home country?

Dinner Time Survey Question 5

For this last question 5, the four “other” responses were “nigeria,” “jason’s big round belly,” “India, since I learned my dinner habits there,” and “Italy.”

With regard to methodology, of course this survey is imperfect, because it fails to consider demographics. Parents will skew the actual and preferred eating times towards the earlier side, certain geographies (Europeans, New Yorkers, etc.) will tend to skew towards the later side, age is a factor and profession no doubt will influence results. In particular, JH argues that for young professionals in the Silicon Valley or perhaps at eBay in particular, certain dinner times are inherently unreasonable.

My conclusion, with which JH undoubtedly will disagree, is that, if I am “unreasonable,” then others, too, are “unreasonable” with me. I’ve shared with JH an initial draft of this post, and he’s already telling me I’ve entirely missed the point of all of his arguments and that my position is indefensible. To be clear, my positions, including those not articulated above, are:

  • Treat your friends with civility and respect
  • You don’t have to be right all the time, and you don’t get your way all the time
  • “Reasonable” necessarily encompasses a broad range of beliefs, all of which are acceptable.

Q.E.D.

JH, you can respond in comments, which I promise I’ll approve.

____________________________________
*Any resemblance to real people could be purely coincidental.

Product Review: 1-Day Acuvue Moist (Daily Disposable Contact Lenses)

1-Day Acuvue Moist Contact Lenses Box

Contact lenses companies seem to release new products each year, and I’m usually skeptical about their claims of year-over-year improvements. However, if you’re at all like me when it comes to eye care, you rely heavily on the recommendations of your optometrist. And when my optometrist describes a new product as potentially “more comfortable” or “better for your eyes,” I am going to tend to try it.

For the past two years, I’ve worn Ciba Vision’s Focus Dailies single-use, daily-disposable lenses, and my optometrist just recommended I try Johnson & Johnson Vision Care’s new, 1-Day Acuvue Moist lenses. I’ve worn soft, daily disposable lenses for a few years now, for convenience (to eliminate the need for cleaning and storage) and safety (from minimal contamination from handling and protein buildup). For a week, at my optometrist’s design, I wore an Acuvue lense in one eye and a Ciba Vision lense in the other.

I have mixed judgments on the 1-Day Acuvue Moist lenses.

The new 1-Day Acuvue Moist lenses do work well with regard to the one attribute that matters most to me: comfort. They are, indeed, more comfortable than my existing Focus Dailies, although my optometrist estimated that around 50% of his patients perceive them as an improvement over other lenses and the other 50% detect no difference. By “comfortable,” I mean two things: (1) the Ciba lense was more palpably more noticeable in my eye and more irritable if dust were beneath it — relative to the Acuvue lense and (2) the Acuvue lense was noticeably less dry at night.

However — and this is a bit difficult to describe — although the 1-Day Acuvue Moist lenses are less noticeable in the eye and dry out less towards the end of the day, I am experiencing the sensation that my eyes are getting slightly less oxygen throughout the day. I’m speculating that this perception is because the Acuvue lenses are 58% water content, whereas the Focus Dailies are 69% water content. Two other drawbacks are (1) delicacy and (2) cost.

Likely due to the technology that makes the lenses “moist,” the 1-Day Acuvue Moists collapse or fold more easily when handling (less rigid) than the Focus Dailies and are slightly more susceptible to dislodgement, for example, if you rub your eye.

Also, the cost is steep. A year supply of Ciba’s Focus Dailies costs $368. After a $200 rebate Ciba presently is offering and the $140 my Vision Service Plan covers, the next cost to me is just $28. The 1-Day Acuvue Moist lenses, new that they are, cost a whopping $638 for a year’s supply. After a rebate and the VSP contribution, the net cost to me $423. Frankly, my optometrist is charging usurious prices, and I expect a little research would reveal better deals online.

On balance, comfort is important enough to me and the increased overall comfort was enough that I’m making the switch from the Focus Dailies to the 1-Day Acuvue Moist lenses. To his credit, my optometrist left the decision to me and actually counseled against a switch unless I noticed a significant difference.

If all you’d like to know is my impression of the 1-Day Acuvue Moist lenses, stop reading here. If you’d like to learn a tad bit more about how these lenses work and about basic contact lense information, continue reading.

__________________________

You may know that contact lenses may be characterized on a number of different dimensions, including:

  • Function (corrective, cosmetic, etc.)
  • Construction Material (plexiglass or Lucite (”hard”), water-containing plastic (”soft”) or waterless plastic (”rigid gas permeable”)
  • Wear time (typically daily or weekly)
  • Frequency of replacement (daily, weekly, bi-weekly, monthly, yearly)
  • Design (spherical or toric, etc.)

Here, we’re discussing corrective, soft, daily-wear, daily-replace lenses, despite arguments that rigid gas permeable lenses are better. For soft lenses, different manufacturer use different plastics, including, but not limited to: Lotrafilcon B, Nelfilcon A, Balafilcon A and Etafilcon A. The plastics are all gas-permeable and contain water.

The source of the increased comfort in the 1-Day Acuvue Moists is Acuvue’s unique and proprietary “LACREON™” technology that “permanently embeds a water-holding ingredient, similar to that found in natural tears, into the proven etafilcon A material.” In other word, the Acuvue Moist lenses permanently hold water around the lense (see below).

1-Day Acuvue Moist Contact Lense Image

Ciba Vision, which introduced Focus Dailies in 1997 and was the market leader as recently as March 2006 (I’m too lazy to find current measures), employs a different technology: “AquaRelease.” The Ciba Vision Web site explains:

“New Focus DAILIES with AquaRelease provide time-release comfort. A moisturizer, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), is released slowly (through pumping and shearing action) from the lens into the tear film, where the PVA lubricates the lens to increase comfort (Figure 1). The distribution of AquaRelease begins to diminish at the end of the day, which helps ensure compliance with the recommended wearing schedule.”

Because my eyes tend to dry out towards the end of the day, the Acuvue Moists, with the persistent water embedding, has greater appeal to me than the time-release technology of the Focus Dailies.

Additional Resources:

Next Page »